Records 1 – 20 of 43 cbdt circular no stay demand instruction, Income Tax, Goods and services Tax, GST, Service Tax, Central Excise, Custom, Wealth Tax. Circular dated 29 Feb held not to supersede earlier Instruction dated 02 Feb in toto, but to only partially modify guidelines. August CBDT partially modifies instruction no. of for stay of demand and increases the payment requirement from 15% to 20%.
|Published (Last):||8 February 2011|
|PDF File Size:||6.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.13 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Board Of Revenue, Allahabad 0. Respondent-State has appeared and filed their counter affidavit seeking to justify their Please log in or register for a free trial to access these features. Though there was no interim stay granted by this Court against the proceedings and hearing of appeals pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals and he could have decided the pending appeals before him on merits by indtruction, but in view of the admitted position that these Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission.
Restriction on Import of Peas from insteuction You have reach your max limit.
CBDT Modifies Guidelines For Stay Of Demand By The AO
Many assessees are taking the plea that Instruction No. Mohapatra submitted that in instruction No. Consumer Disputes Redressal 0. Dhaka High Court 0. Relying upon the said Instruction No. Bank Of Baroda v.
Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange 0. Heard the learned counsel for insttuction petitioner, and perused Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange. Goods and Service Tax.
CBDT Modifies Guidelines For Stay Of Demand By The AO |Useful Miscellania
Armed Forces Tribunal 1. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission 0. Maheshwari Agro Industries v.
Learned Senior Counsel Sri. This principle cannot be straight away applied to Revenue matters, where a slight departure is required to be adopted. Having considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that although Instruction No. Debts Recovery Tribunal 0. First Appellate Authority 0.
The respondents failed to appreciate Instruction Number 96, dated However, this very instructionas pointed out by learned senior counsel for the petitioner, has once again been considered by the Division Bench of this court in Soul Intellectual Property Appellate Board 0.
Rajeshwari Sangeet Academy Trust, jalandhar v.
Patna High Court Filter Filter through years using slider. Himachal Pradesh High Court 4. Bombay High Court National Company Law Appellate Tribunal.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission 0. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Cyber Appellate Tribunal 0.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission. In order to insrruction the process of grant of stay and standardize Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, and Board Of Revenue, Uttarakhand 0. Gujarat High Court 8.
Uttarakhand High Court 0. National Company Law Tribunal 0. Instructions on the issue also ceased to exist the day Instruction number came into operation i. Discount after Supply F: