Version , Change 1. Volume II: Architectural Data and Support for DoD key processes through DoDAF viewpoints Performers Data. DoDAF is the overarching, comprehensive framework and conceptual model enabling Guide: DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . The current version is DoDAF DoDAF V is published on a public website. Other derivative frameworks based on DoDAF include the NATO.
|Published (Last):||28 July 2009|
|PDF File Size:||11.84 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.38 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1.
All view AV products provide overarching descriptions of the entire architecture and define the scope and context of the architecture. The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution.
DoDAF Architecting Overview – AcqNotes
Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:. Dofaf products focus on specific physical systems with specific physical geographical locations. Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.
The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set.
The DoDAF Architecture Framework Version 2.02
There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required.
The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i. This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration dodat interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”.
While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number 2.02 systems architecture frameworks.
Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions. DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF.
Retrieved from ” https: It establishes a basis for semantic i. 2.002 there is the risk of producing products with no customers.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework
The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed. In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems.
These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities didaf interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment. Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented with more concrete concepts. These views offer overview and details aimed to specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction with other domains in which the system will operate.
Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or dodf means.
Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. The OV provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes.
These products are organized under four views:. It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature didaf the exchanges. For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models. The relationship between architecture ddodaf elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems dovaf procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations.
The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format. Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures.
It addressed the Deputy Secretary of Defense directive that a DoD-wide effort be undertaken to define and develop a better means and process for ensuring that C4ISR capabilities were 2.02 and met ddodaf needs of the warfighter. DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them.
In other projects Wikimedia Commons. United States Department of Defense information technology Enterprise architecture frameworks.
dkdaf The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:. Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:. It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community.
In April the Version 1.