Get this from a library! Relecciones sobre los indios y el derecho de guerra. [ Francisco de Vitoria]. Relecciones sobre los indios y el derecho de guerra. Front Cover. Francisco de Vitoria. Espasa-Calpe Argentina, s.a. – Indians, Treatment of – pages. Né à Burgos (d’une mère d’ascendance juive), Francisco entre en au couvent Estudio crítico de introducción a sus Lecturas y Relecciones, Madrid, Vitoria, Francisco de, Sobre el poder civil, Sobre los Indios, Sobre el derecho de la.
|Published (Last):||8 July 2009|
|PDF File Size:||12.68 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.76 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Still, Vitoria is called one of the founders of international law along with Alberico Gentili and Hugo Grotius. Inhe was elected to the Chair of indioos at the University of Salamancawhere he was instrumental in promoting Thomism the philosophy and theology of St.
relexciones Andrea Aizpuru added it Jun 14, Vitoria denied the legitimacy of this document. Catholicism portal Philosophy portal. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Shantanu Singh marked it as to-read Apr 09, It will finally be shown that for Vitoria a way to morally justify the deaths of innocents is in fact not compatible with the doctrine of double effect and that it should rather be seen as the consequence of an early form of probabilistic reasoning, which in the end endorses less certain moral principles over more certain rules. The Indians had to accept the sovereignty of the Spanish monarchs or be compelled to submit by force.
James Millikan rated it really liked it May 01, This article problematizes this periodization, arguing that the first, developed, color-blind racist philosophy was, rather, developed by sixteenth-century Spanish jurists seeking to develop an international legal framework to justify—in universal, humanist, and color-blind terms—the colonial domination and exploitation of the Caribbean and the Americas. If there is an empirical difference between a short and friendly visit and a long and invasive residence, the normative distinction is not entirely justified.
Buscando a las Musas Perdidas: LA DOCTRINA DE FRANCISCO DE VITORIA
Through a careful reading of the work of Francisco de Vitoria, I explain how the creation of a ” color-blind ” system of universal human rights—specifically, the ” universal rights ” to travel vioria commerce— operated to uphold systematic white and Euro supremacy through ” color-blind ” discourses.
La conquista senza fondamento, Milano, Feltrinelli, The essay focuses rwlecciones the almost forgotten Dominican Miguel de Arcos, a 16th Century central figure in the debate about the Spanish Conquest of the New World. Refusing the entry of the Spaniards may be a just cause for a war.
Baker Book House, Help Center Find new research papers in: Neither the pope nor Charles V had a rightful claim over Indian lives or property.
Relecciones Sobre Los Indios Y El Derecho De Guerra
Francisco de Vitoria died on 12 August  in Salamanca. Dios, lobo y hombre. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Thus, killing innocents, although undesirable, can be justified on moral grounds.
Francisco de Vitoria – Wikipedia
It will first trace the reasons for saying that the intended aim of self-defence, being an evident moral No violent action could be taken against them, nor could their lands or property be seized, unless the Indians had caused harm or injury to the Spanish by violating the latter’s lawful rights.
August Learn how and when to remove this template message. Skip to main content. Valdemar Gomes marked it as to-read Oct 31, Martinique Pineda rated it it was amazing Jun 04, Holmes Grand Rapids, MI: The analysis of some of his documents, collected in the Universidad de Sevilla’s For the bishop, see Francisco de Vitoria bishop.
Francisco de Vitoria
Wikisource has original works written by or about: This had already been the position of Palacios Rubios.
Concordia y discordia en el Renacimiento: If it is humane and just to welcome and treat strangers well, it does releccciones mean for Vitoria that there is a cause for just war if this duty is not fulfilled.
This work examines how the concept of slave by nature, that had become neglected in medieval political theory until the late fifteenth century, reappears in the first quarter of the sixteenth century in connection with the discovery of Loe. He makes of it an imperfect duty of beneficence that remains secondary to the principle of sovereignty.
This section does not cite any sources. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.